CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF CIVIL ORGANIZATIONAL AND LEGAL COMMUNICATIONS (45-51)

Национальная ассоциация ученых (НАУ) # 58, 20 20 45
158 -О-О об отказе в принятии к рассмотрению
жалобы гражданина Усенко Дмитрия Николаевича
на нарушение его конституционных прав
положениями статьи 8 Федеральн ого закона «Об
оперативно -розыскной деятельности» // СПС
«КонсультантПлюс»;
3. Определение Конституционного Суда
Российской Феде рации от 19 декабря 2017 года №
2810 -О об отказе в принятии к рассмотрению жалоб
гражданина Давлетова Андрея Юрьевича на
нарушен ие его конституционных прав статьей 89
Уголовно -процессуального кодекса Российской
Федерации [Электронный ресурс] // СПС
«Консул ьтантПлюс».
4. Постановление ЕСПЧ от 5 марта 2018 г.
«Д удченко против России » (жалоба N 37717/05).
URL: http://www.consultant.ru
5. Постановление ЕСПЧ от 12 мая 2000 г. "Хан
(Khan) против Великобритании" (жалоба N
35394/97). URL: http://www.consultant.ru
6. Постановление ЕСПЧ от 10 марта 2009 г.
"Быков против России" (жалоба N 4378/02). URL:
http://www.consultant.ru
7. Постановление ЕС ПЧ от 4 декабря 2015 г.
«Роман Захаров против России» (жалоба N
47143/06). URL: http://www.consultant.ru (дата
обращения: 31.10.2019).
8. Кравченко Д. Конкретизация регулирования
будет полезной. Нормативное закрепле ние
принципов и критериев в целом создает условия
для трансформации практики // Новая адвокатская
газета. 2018. 31 августа.
9. Никонов М. Прослушку санкционируют, но
не проверяют // Независимая газета. 2019. 14 мая.
URL: http://www.ng.ru/kartblansh/2019 -05 -
14/3_7572_cart.html.
10. Шатохин И.Д. Принцип уважения и
соблюдения прав и свобод человека и гражданина в
оперативно -розыскной деятельности: автореф. ...
канд. юрид. наук. СПб., 2018.
11. Чечетин А.Е., Шатохин И.Д. Некоторые
проблемные вопросы правового регулирования
прослуши вания телефонных переговоров //
Известия Алтайского государственного
университета. 2017. N 6 (98).
12. Чупилкин. Ю.Б. Гарантии права личности
на частную жизнь при прослушивании телефонных
переговоров: Стандарты ЕСПЧ // СПС
Консультан тПлюс (дата обращения 29.10.2020)

CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF CIVIL ORGANIZATIONAL AND LEGAL
COMMUNICATIONS

Topildiev Vokhidjon Rakhimjonovich
Professor of department
“Theory and practice of building a democratic state”
candidate of juridical sciences Ass. Professor,
National University of Uzbekistan,
100174, University stre et, 4 th house, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
DOI: 10.31618/nas.2413 -5291.2020.1.58.271
Abstract
In this article, the author expresses his attitude towards the criteria and classification proposed by the lawyer
scientists in relation to the classification of organizational and legal relations, concludes that it is necessary to
introduce special norms in civil law for civil organizational and legal relations, in case of analyzing the expediency
of defining the pur pose of the appointment of these relations. He also put forward proposals and recommendations
that organizational and legal relations can be divided into relations (initial), relations of carrying out activities of
Legal Entities (corporate), relations rel ated to property management (management of civil legal activities), which
constitute legal relations and provide a legal basis for carrying out certain activities.
Key words : Organizational and legal relations; civil -legal relations; property rights; civi l law ; corporate law;
organizational -control and organizational -information; organizational -initial; organizational -representation.

Organizational and legal relations, which are
considered a separate type of civil -legal relations, are
also classified as other types of civil -legal relations, and
such a classification is distinguished by its wide
coverage and diversity. Article 2 of the civil code of the
Republic of Uzbekistan does not specify a specifi c
commonality and strict criteria for the division of
relations into types regulated by civil law. According to
it, Civil legislation establishes the legal status of
participants in civil circulation, the basis for the
formation of property rights and othe r property rights,
the rights to the resu lts of legal activity, as well as the
1 Zokirov I.B. Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil law].
Tashkent: TGJuI, 2009. 123 p.
procedure for their implementation, regulates
contractual obligations and other obligations, other
property and personal non -financial relations
associated with it.
As in the te xtbooks of civil law, the types of civil
legal relations are divided into types in general order.
However, not every species of them is tried to classify.
For Example, I.B.Zakirov proposes to establish the
basis of legal relations in the division of civil -legal
relations into types, the scope of powers of subjects of
legal relations, the origin of material and intangible
blessings from the state of civil circulation 1.

46 Национальная ассоциация ученых (НАУ) # 58, 20 20
Although in the civil code it is not established that
organizational and legal relations a re regulated by civil
legislation, it is worth noting that organizational and
legal relations are also regulated by civil law, taking
into account the fact that the main place in civil law
regulation is the organization of dispositive norms. The
current ci vil legislation regula tes organizational and
legal relations both through its general norms and in
separate special norms.
In its essence, the list of organizational relations,
which is not considered a property and personal non -
existent relationship, is a imed at the organizati on,
formation and maintenance of other relations, is
considered quite extensive today. This situation makes
it difficult to legally regulate organizational relations
by legislation, and here defines separate norms in civil
law for civ il organizational and legal relations in the
regulation of the complexity and development of
multifaceted social relations.
Civil organizational -legal relations as mentioned
above, represent social relations between entities that
are legally equal and have property independent,
autonomous will and subjective organizational rights
provided by the state and undertake subjective
organizational responsibilities.
These legal relations have a certain commonality,
and within the framework of this commonality they can
be divided into se parate groups.
The division of civil organizational and legal
relations into types, classification of it originally
proposed by O.A.Krasavchikov. In his opinion, these
legal relations can be classified according to a number
of signs f or scientific purposes (according to the
stability of these legal relations, according to their
subspecies, according to their social content).
According to this criterion, civil organizational and
legal relations can be divided into the following types:
1) organizational -init ial (causative) relations;
2) organizational -representative relations;
3) organizational -control relations;
4) organizational -information relations 2.
Of course, such a differentiation of civil
organizational and legal relations arises from the types
of non -proprietary legal relations. However, it will also
be possible to divide organizational and legal relations
that are part of the subject of civil law into types
according to other criteria. For example, civil
organizational and legal relations can be divided into
pure civil organizational and legal relations, which are
not related to corporate legal relations and corporate
relations. At the same time, it is also possible to divide
organizational -legal relations into organization al
relations, ar ising from the activities of legal entities, at
the time of conclusion of contracts and arising from
contracts. The organizational and legal relations arising
from the activities of legal entities, including the
relations associated with th e registration a nd
management of the legal entity, the stages of
2 Krasavchikov O.A. Grazhdanskie organizacionno -
pravovye otnos henija//Ontalogija ural'skoj civilistiki
[Civil legal relations // Ontalogy of the Ural civil law].
1925 -1989. 2001. pp. 163 -164.
establishing contractual relations and the contractual
arrangements for the organization of transportation (the
offer and the contract). acceptances and methods
(auctions, tenders), and also the power of att orney on
relations arising from contracts, trust management of
property, and such the organizational and legal
relations that arise from them. It is also recognized in
the literature that there are other types of civil
organizational -legal relations.
Howe ver, in the deep analysis of civil -legal
relations it is important to study the differentiation
proposed by O .A.Krasavchikov and to give a scientific -
theoretical evaluation .
Organizational -initial relations recognition of
citizenship as an independent type of organizational -
legal relations O.A.Krasavchikov notes that these
relations arise on the basis of attachment to the
formation and implementation, and in some cases on
the basis of the development of basic (property or
personal non -proper ty) relations. O.A.Krasavchikov
introduces a lot of legal ties into organizational -initial
relations, but in many places it is limited to bringing
some examples to them. In his opinion, the following
can be an example of an organizational -initial relations :
a) product del ivery, capital construction contract,
project and search works contractual obligations;;
b) obligations arising from transport agreements
between contractors in the field of organization of
transport activities;
c) other agreements establi shing organizati onal -
legal relations.
Organizational representative relations are a
special type of civil -law relations, and as a result of
their implementation, the right to carry out a specific
property or non -property act is transferred from one
person to another. Orga nizational -representative
relations include:
a) relationship that implies issuance and recall of
power of attorney;
b) relations with the election of the governing
body of a legal entity;
c) relations with the election of a representative for
participatio n in the work of a high -ranking body of
corporate or social organizations 3.
Organizational -control and organizational -
information relations are seen as a separate independent
type of civil organizational -legal relations.
O.A.Krasavchikov c onnects their implementation with
the creation of the necessary conditions for the
adequate d evelopment of the main “organizational”
relations, legal relations and ensuring the stability of
these relations.
The scope of organizational -control and
organizat ional -information relations is broad enough.
O.A.Krasavchikov believes that the following leg al
relations can be included in the organizational -
supervisory relations:
3 Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe pravo. T.1. Izd. 2 -e.
Uchebnik dlja vuzov/Pod.red. O.A.Krasavchikov
[Soviet civil law. T.1. Ed. 2nd. Textbook for high
schools / Under.ed. O.A.Krasavchikov]. 160 p.

Национальная ассоциация ученых (НАУ) # 58, 20 20 47
a) competence of project organizations on
authorship control;
b) the right to demand the fulfillment of the task
from the intermediary set by the committee;
c) the right of the customer under the contract of
capital construction to carry out control and technical
inspection from the contractor for the volume, cost and
quality of performa nce of work.
As for the organizational -information
relationship, O.A.Krasavchikov introduces the
following legal relations:
a) the obligation of the contractor to timely warn
the customer of the circumstances of the suitability and
durability of the work performed, th e obligation of the
buyer to warn the buyer about the rights of third parties
in relation to the goods;
b) the obligation of the assignee to inform the
debtor of the fulfillment of the obligation and other
messages; the obligation to exchange information
between the committee and the intermediary.
Of course, these analyzes and the criteria and types
of differentiation of civil organizational -legal relations
into types have a specific logical and legal basis, as well
as consistency. However, in terms of con tent and in
essence, the examples given to all types of civil
organizational and legal relations, and the civil -legal
structures cited for their justification, are more closely
related to proprietary legal relations. It is reasonable to
admit that the type s of civil organizational -legal
relations proposed by O.A.K rasavchikov, emphasizing
that their naming is specific, the examples presented to
them are controversial in today's modern civil
legislation. Consequently, in today's civil legislation ,
organizatio nal -initial, organizational -representation,
organizational -control and organizational -information
relations have gained new meaning and meaning with
the improvement of corporate legislation and relations.
Now there is an opportunity to come up with a lot o f
legal relations, which are inherent in each type of civil
organizational -legal relations and have a pure
organizational -legal character. For this reason, it is
possible to bring not only new and absolutely pure
organizational attitudes that relate to the justification of
the types of civil organizational and legal relations, but
also it is possible to offer new types of civil
organizational and legal relations, which
O.A.K rasavchikov proposed. This situation is primarily
due to the fact that the methods o f civil -legal regulation
are well established, the state participation in the
activities of legal entities and subjects of
entrepreneurial activity is significantly reduced, as well
as the definition of new bases of civil legislation
specific to the market economy.
4 Rakhmonkulov Kh.R. Guljamov S.S. Korporativnoe
pravo [Corporate law]. TGJuI, 2007. 16 p. 5 Stepanov P.V. Korporativnye otnoshenija v
grazhdanskom prave // Zakonodatel'stvo [Corporate
relatio ns in civil law // Legislation]. 2002. № 6. 35 p. 6 Erdelevskij A.M. O zashhite lichnyh
neimushhestvennyh prav akcionerov // Hozjajstvo i
pravo [On the protection of personal non -property
In our opinion, the transition of corporate relations
and their types as a new type of civil organizational -
legal relations is of paramount importance. In the legal
literature, it is recognized that corporate relations are a
new kin d of legal re lationship. In Particular, according
to O.A. Zakirov, in the system of market relations, a
new type of civil -legal relations -corporate legal
relations -also arose, which led to the fact that the circle
of the subject of civil law is connected wi th
organizati onal -legal relations. Organizational -legal
structures of subjects with signs of a legal entity are
legal relations that arise on the basis of membership
(participation) in corporations. The content of such
legal relations is corporate law. But without a pu rely
private legal attitude to corporate legal attitude, it
covers also elements of some public -legal attitude (tax,
administrative management).
According H.R.Rahmonkulov and
S.S.Gulyamov’s opinion, corporate law is considered a
branch of civ il law. First of all, this is explained by the
similarity of regulated relations with the fact that in this
or that case it acquires a property character and has the
property of forming an alternative remuneration 4.
According to P.V.Stepanov, corporate relations
have a property nature and, consequently, on their
basis, the economic relations of the property lie 5.
A.M.Erdelevsky notes that participation in
management and the right to information is a personal
non – exclusive right, since they do not have property
content and, by their nature, are inextricably linked
with the individual, are not separated from it 6.
Exactly such point of view S.N.Bratus also
indicates, and according to his rule, the rights arising
from membership in the organization belon g to
personal non -exclusive rights, which are the rights that
are not alienated, separated from the member of the
organization, until they leave the membership, belong
to this member 7.
According to V.A.Rakhmilovich's confession,
internal organizational r elati ons of the corporate type
express a mixed combination of property and personal
non -property relations, and at the same time it is
impossible to come to a firm decision on the property
nature of organizational relations 8.
In our opinion, here B.A.Rak hmilov ich's thoughts
are quite relevant. Because membership relations, that
is, the membership of a subject in a certain
organizational -legal structure of legal entities, express
a combination of specific material and intangible
interests, and therefore, i n most cases, these rights and
freedoms, and in the absence of them, give the
opportunity to interpret the relations associated with
them as civil organizational -legal relations. Also, the
legal relations between membership and its rights and
rights of shareholders // Economy and Law.]. 1997. №
6. 70 p . 7 Bratus' S.N. Predmet i sistema sovetskogo
grazhdanskogo prava [The subject and system of Soviet
civil law]. 1963. 74 p. 8 Grazhdanskoe pravo Rossii: Kurs lekcij. Chast' 1
[Civil law of Russia: a course of lectures. Part 1]. 1996.
61 p.

48 Национальная ассоциация ученых (НАУ) # 58, 20 20
organizationa l-lega l structures constitute create such a
system of social and legal relations, as well as the
organizational -legal structures, constitute such a
system of socio -legal relations that in the system of
civil legal relations constitute a separate category,
system and society, these relations can be called
corporate relations, and by defining common and
mixed property .
The right of membership, which expresses a
specific synthesis of property and personal non -
property rights, is considered significant with
ind ivisib le and non -separable. For example, in this
combination, the following property rights can be seen:
- the right to receive income;
- the right to receive the termination quota;
Personal property rights in this synthesis include
the following:
- the ri ght to participate in management (the right
to call the general meeting of members, the right to
participate in the general meeting, the right to be
elected to the bodies of a legal entity);
- the right to receive information;
- the right to control 9.
Participa nts will be able to transfer from one
person to another, in other words, these rights are rights
that can be alienated from the owner, in contrast to the
traditional non -traditional rights of the legal nature of
non -nominal rights. Therefore, these rights and the
relations arising from them can be considered as civil
organizational -legal relations.
In the theory of civil law the differentiation of civil
organizational -legal relations, cited by
O.A.K rasavchikov, is not only deeply studied, but also
in some places critical relations are expressed in such a
classification. Such classification is based on the
content of those or those links. However, the first group
(organizational -initial relations -V.T.) another common
criterion is separated from the role of o rganizational -
legal relations.
As noted above, the relations of the first group,
separated by O.A.K rasavchikov, include
organizational -initial and organizational -representative
relations. According to T.I.I llarionova, this group
includes the r elations of t he offerent and the acceptor
before the contract, representative relations, relations
that create the conditions for the existence of an
absolute right of ownership, relations that make up
some non -legal relations (for example, relations
betwe en persons wh o applied with the same formula of
the invention) and some other relations.
As recognized above, the second group of
organizational relations by O.A.K rasavchikov includes
control, information and other relations. T.I.Illarionova
noted that ap art from thes e relations, this group
9Stepanov P.V. Korporativnye otnoshenija v
kommercheskih organizacijah kak sostavnaja chast'
predmeta grazhdanskogo prava [Corporate relations in
commercial organizations as an integral part of the
subject of civil law. Doct. Diss.]: 1999. Lomakin D.V.
Akcion ernoe pravootnoshenie: ponjatie, soderzhanie,
subekty [Stock relationship: concept, content, subjects.
Doct. Diss.]: 1996. pp. 23 -24.
includes the legal relationship between the author and
the publisher, which is based on the procedure for
expressing respect when the legal relationship and
contractual obligations arising before the publication of
the work are viol ated 10.
It can be concluded that in these views expressed
in relation to the classification of civil organizational -
legal relations, the state of certain generality and
justification for a single criterion are not considered. In
other words, the differenti ation ( division) proposed by
O.A.K rasavchikov tries to group all the relations
existing in civil law and practice, p roceeding from this
or that point of view, and does not intend to classify
them. Also O.A.Krasavchikov conditionally divided
the elements of a certain legal relation s into groups of
organizational -legal character, and also called their
nomenclature by a si ngle criterion.
The differentiation of civil organizational -legal
relations by T.I.I llarionova is d ifferent from
O.A.K rasavchikov's current reality differentiation, it is
based on other criteria. T.I.Illarionova not only
distinguishes them, but also class ifies organizational -
legal relations by dividing them into two independent
groups. According to it, the first group of
organizationa l-legal relations is not considered the
initial (initial and representative), the second group is
the initial relationship ( but rather the supply
relationship -control, information relations).
K.A.Kirsanov believes that the differentiation of
civil organizational -legal relations proposed by
O.A.K rasavchikov, and the differentiation of
T.I.I llarionova are not a differentiation of civil
organizational -legal relations, but a differentiation of
organizational -relations, which is distinguished in the
subject of civil la w. Here criterion of sosial content
proposed by O.A.K rasavchikov and the criteria for the
functional task expressed by illarionova are not
intended for the classification of organizational -legal
relations, but for the classification of organizational -
relat ions.
In our opinion, the proposed criteria for the
classification of organizational -legal relations in this
place are considered important in the classification of
these relations, in the identification and legal regulation
of their system. Therefore, th e criteria for dividing them
into species should be based not only on the criteria of
social (sociological content and functional
significance), but also only on legal criteria, and in this
they should be considered the basis of the classification
of organ izational -relations as social relations within the
scope of the subject of civil law.
In th e legal literature, it is proposed to classify
civil organizational -legal relations according to the
criteria for their normative designation, and in this case
10 Illarionova T.I. Grazhdansko -pravovye
organizacionnye otnoshenija i sposoby ih zashhity //
Grazhdanskoe pravo, jeko nomik a i standartizacija:
Mezhvuz sb. Nauch [Civil -law organizational relations
and methods of their protection // Civil law, economics
and standardization: Interuniversity collection.
scientific]. 64. Sverdlovsk, 1978. pp. 29 -30.

Национальная ассоциация ученых (НАУ) # 58, 20 20 49
it i s proposed to divide them into independent
organizational and legal relations (“organization al and
legal relations in pure form”) and “relatively
independent” organizational -legal relations, that is,
legal relations in civil legislation, recognized as an
element 11.
In our opinion, the criteria proposed for the
division of civil organizational -legal relations into
types, as well as such types of organizational -legal
relations, are also controversial and respectful. After
all, organizational -legal relations i n this way can be
divided into two, in general, and dividing them into
pure organizational -legal relations and non -pure,
relatively independent and auxiliary organizational -
legal relations can contradict the content and essence of
these relations and lead to incorrect legal assessment of
them. For example, organizational -legal relations, such
as the creation of a legal entity, the formation of a
statutory fund, the conclusion of constituent contracts,
can not be resolved strictly on the issue of belonging t o
exactly independent organizational and legal relations
or “relatively independent” organi zational -legal
relations. At the same time it can not be considered that
in the legislation of this or that organizational -legal
relations is a pure organizational -legal relationship,
elements of such property and personal non -political
relations are not f oreseen.
Therefore, it is desirable to establish the purpose
of the appointment of these relations as a legal criterion
for the classification of civil organization al relations.
Here can be divided into organizational -legal relations
(initial), relations of legal entities (corporate), relations
related to property management (management of civil
legal activities, but not representative)and other similar
relations, wh ich constitute legal relations and form a
legal basis for the implementation of certain activities.
As recognized above, critical relations were
expressed in the types of civil organizational and legal
relations proposed by O.A.K rasavchikov and the
criteri a for their classification. One such critical
approach is as reported by O.S. Iof fe, it would be
possible to assume that the provisions of many other
civil -legal norms are also inherent in this type of
relations, in his opinion, because of such reasoning on
organizational relations. As a r esult, numerous civil
organizational -legal rela tions, recognized by
O.A.K rasavchikov can arise which in turn do not fit
into the four types of circles proposed by the author 12.
It is ranked O.S.Ioffe's thoughts can not be j oined.
O.A.Krasavchikov noted that according to the so cial
content there are ma ny types of civil organizational -
legal relations, and since he left the list open, he did not
put in this place the separation of all types of civil
organizational -legal relatio ns, as his first priority task,
11 Kirsanov K.A. Grazhdansko -pravovoe regulirovanie
organizacionnyh otnoshenij [Civil regulation of
organizational relations. Doct. Diss.]. Ekaterinburg.
2008. 108 p. 12Ioffe O.S. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu:
Iz istorii civilisticheskoj mysli. Gra zhdanskoe
pravootnoshenie. Kr itika teorii «hozjajstvennogo
as well as the determination of the location of each of
them.
On the classification of organizational relations
T.V.Kashanina's point of view is of particular interest.
T.V.Kashanina distinguishes and analyzes various
types of organizational relations through the prism of
organizational contract.
1.Pur e organizational agreements: constituent
agreements (on the establishment of corporates and
corporate associations); agreements on reorganization;
agreements on the termination of activities.
2. Agreements on joint activities (ordinary
company contracts), management contracts for them
(for example, on granting to the management of another
corporation); contracts between executive bodies and
legal entities; contracts for the excha nge of information
(information contracts); mutual control and some other
agree ments;
3.Preliminary agreements: simple preliminary
agreements (for example, agreements on the
organization of transportation) and agreements on the
establishment of long -term e conomic relations;
4. Mandatory contracts (in particular, the state
contract);
5. Investment agreements;
6. Agreements on the order of the enterprise;
7. Contracts for participation in profits.
T.V.Kashanina noted that the “list of the types of
organizatio nal contracts indicated is not complete,
although large” 13.
According to H.R.Rahmonkulov and
S.S.Gulyamov, in the practice of entrepreneurial
activity of corporate organizations, several
organizational and legal contracts are known. Among
these, the followi ng can be included:
- on the establishment of legal entities in the form
of constituent contracts (full economic associations, a
company, including a corporation);
- agreements on reorganization (addition,
subtraction, modification, division, addition,
sub traction);
- agreements on cooperation;
- preliminary contracts (basic c ontracts for the
performance of work or for the provision of services
find property on the conditions specified in the initial
contract);
- корпорация тузилишининг ўзидаги
ташкилий -ҳуқ уқий муносабатлар;
- organizational -legal relations of the corporation
itself;
- contracts for establishing long -term economic
relations;
- other agreements that fall under the subject of
civil law, which can be used in the activities of
corporate organiza tions.
prava» [Selected Works on Civil Law: From the
History of Civil Law Thought. Civil relationship.
Criticism of the theory of "economic law"]. 2000. pp.
259 -260. 13 Kashanina T.V. Korporativnoe pravo: Uchebnik dlja
vuzov [Corpora te Law: Textbook for High Schools].
1999. 53 p.

50 Национальная ассоциация ученых (НАУ) # 58, 20 20
In our opinion, although the differentiation of
org anizational contracts presented by T.V.K ashanina
has a specific scientific value, it has certain
shortcomings also .
In particular, T.V.Kashanina remains open to the
fact that on the basis of what criteria the organizational
contracts divided . The fact tha t there is no single
criterion for classification, in its essenc e t he fact that
T.V.K ashanina has types of organizational contracts
and the list presented by her indicates that she does not
have a final tone. At the same time, it seems that the
division of organizational contracts into types within
separate groups does not have a clear and logical
sequence in some places. For Example, the division of
preliminary contracts by T.V.K ashanina into simpl e
preliminary contracts (the contract of the organization
of transportation) and contracts aimed at establishing
long -term economic relations. Because according to
Article 722 of the civil code , the carrier and the shipper
can also conclude a long -term con tract for the
organization of transportation, depending on the
necessity. This means that the legislator gives the
parties the opportunity to conclude a contract for the
organization of long -term and permanent, systematic
long -term transportation, which im plies the
establishment of a long -term organizational
relat ionship betwe en them.
In our opinion, although T.V.K ashanina's citation
of the types of organizational contracts acquires a
specific science, she does not take into account the
cases when organiza tiona l-legal relations are formed on
the basis of other legal facts, and therefore have a one -
sided character.
It is also worth paying special attention to the
division of organizational and legal relations by
A.M.M artemyanova into types from the point of view
of their connection with property and legal relations of
obligations. The location A.M.M artemyanova
explained that civil organizational -legal relations are
inextricably linked with the legal relations of
obligations, that “the organizational -legal re lations are
divided into two large groups, proceed ing from each of
these links,” the first group creates (changes, ends) the
legal relations of obligations, and the second group of
legal relations ensures their development, validity and
is part of them 14.
In our opinion, A. M. Martemyanova will also be
abl e to talk about the connection of civil organizational -
legal relations with compulsory legal relations, and
about the two groups of this legal relations on the basis
of their presence in the two groups with property and
non -legal relations. In this, legal relations in the first
group will focus on the emergence of “organizational”
legal relations, while legal relations in the second group
will focus on the regulation, development of existing
organizational -legal relations. For this reason,
organizational re lations in the first group can be called
organizational -legal relations, in which the right is
14 Martem'janova A.M. Obekt organizacionnogo
pravootnoshenija //Problemy objazatel'stvennogo
prava: Mezhvuz. sb. nauch. tr [The object of
established, and the legal relations in the second group
are organizational -legal relations that provide the rig ht.
Proceeding from the situation in modern civil law,
the civil organizational -legal relations arising from the
law can be attributed to the following: representative
legal relations (Article 129 of the Civil Code); legal
relations arising from the initia l agreements (Article
361 of the Civil Code); rel ations arising from the
agreements for the organization of transportation
(article 722 of the Civil Code); legal relations for the
organization); legal relations in the process of
concluding a contract (arti cles 364 -381 of the Civil
Code); legal relations arising from the legal regulation
of the emission of securities (Article 96 of the Civil
Code, article 35 -46 of the law “on the rights of the joint -
stock companies and shareholders”); the organizer of
the lo ttery and the participant of the lottery -the lega l
relations between the owner of the lottery ticket (article
984 of the Civil Code ); the legal relations with the
acquisition of property rights to found or neglected
domestic animals (articles 192, 195 of t he Civil Code )
and other legal relations.
On the basis of the analysis of the current civil law,
the following legal relations can be entered into the
organizational -legal relations that provide the right: the
legal relations whose content constitutes the right of the
shareholder to receive information a bout the activities
of the joint -stock company (article 27 of the law “On
the rights of the joint -stock companies”); warning the
customer about the circumstances of the contractor's
performance of the contra ct and the relevant right of the
customer (articl e 393 of the Civil Code); obligation of
the contractor to provide information to the customer
and the relevant right of the contractor (article 643 of
the Civil Code); the obligation of the contractor to
pro vide information to the customer and the
correspo nding right of the contractor (article 643 of the
Civil Code); the representative must provide him with
information on how the assignment is performed in
accordance with the request of the assignment operato r
and the relevant right of the assignment operat or
(article 820 of the Civil Code), etc.

REFERENCES
1. Bratus' S.N. Predmet i sistema sovetskogo
grazhdanskogo prava [ The subject and system of Soviet
civil law ]. 1963. 74 p.
2. Grazhdanskoe pravo Rossii: Kurs lekcij. Chast'
1 [Civil law of Russia: a course of lectures. Part 1].
1996. 61 p.
3.Erdelevskij A.M. O zashhite lichnyh
neimushhestvennyh prav akcionerov // Hozjajstvo i
pravo [On the protection of personal non -property
rights of shareholders // Econ omy and Law.]. 1997. №
6. 70 p.
4. Zokirov I.B. Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil law].
Tashkent: TGJuI, 2009. pp. 123 -124.
5. Martem'janova A.M. Obekt organizacionnogo
pravootnoshenija //Problemy objazatel'stvennogo
organizational legal relations // Problems of the law of
obligations: I nteruniversity. Sat scientific tr].
Sverdlovsk: 1989. 66 p.

Национальная ассоциация ученых (НАУ) # 58, 20 20 51
prava: Mezhvuz. sb. nauch. tr [The object of
organizational legal relations // Pr oblems of the law of
obligations: Interuniversity. Sat scientific tr].
Sverdlovsk: 1989. 66 p.
6. Krasavchikov O.A. Grazhdanskie
organizacionno -pravovye otnoshenija//Ontalogija
ural'skoj civilistiki [ Civil legal relatio ns // Ontalogy of
the Ural civil law ]. 1925 -1989. 2001. pp. 163 -164.
7. Kirsanov K.A. Grazhdansko -pravovoe
regulirovanie organizacionnyh otnoshenij [Civil
regulation of organizational relations. Doct. Diss.].
Ekaterinburg. 2008. pp.107 -108.
8. Kashanina T.V. Korporativnoe pravo:
Uchebnik d lja vuzov [Corporate Law: Textbook for
High Schools]. 1999. pp. 51 -53.
9. Rakhmonkulov Kh.R. Guljamov S.S.
Korporativnoe pravo [Corporate law]. TGJuI, 2007. pp.
16, 22.
10. Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe pravo. T.1. Izd. 2 -e.
Uchebnik dlja vuzov/Pod.red. O.A.Kras avchikov
[Soviet civil law. T.1. Ed. 2nd. Textbook for high
schools / Under.ed. O.A.Krasavchikov]. 160 p.
11. Stepanov P.V. Korporativnye otnoshenija v
grazhdanskom prave // Zakonodatel'stvo [Corporate
relations in civi l law // Legislation]. 2002. № 6. 35 p.
12. Stepanov P.V. Korporativnye otnoshenija v
kommercheskih organizacijah kak sostavnaja chast'
predmeta grazhdanskogo prava [Corporate relations in
commercial organizations as an integral part of the
subject of civi l law. Doct. Diss.]: 1999. Lomakin D .V.
Akcionernoe pravootnoshenie: ponjatie, soderzhanie,
subekty [Stock relationship: concept, content, subjects.
Doct. Diss.]: 1996. pp. 23 -24.
13. Illarionova T.I. Grazhdansko -pravovye
organizacionnye otnoshenija i spo soby ih zashhity //
Grazhdanskoe pra vo, jekonomika i standartizacija:
Mezhvuz sb. Nauch [Civil -law organizational relations
and methods of their protection // Civil law, economics
and standardization: Interuniversity collection.
scientific]. 64. Sverdlovsk , 1978. pp. 29 -30.
14. Ioffe O.S. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu
pravu: Iz istorii civilisticheskoj mysli. Grazhdanskoe
pravootnoshenie. Kritika teorii «hozjajstvennogo
prava» [Selected Works on Civil Law: From the
History of Civil Law Thought. Civil re lationship.
Criticis m of the theory of "economic law"]. 2000. pp.
259 -260.